Iu. Chupryna, V. Pokolenko, M. Horbach, O. Bolebrukh, D. Hrabchak


The article analyzes the market position of construction companies and builds a justification for updated methodological and analytical tools for evaluating, selecting, and building a productive system of portfolio administration of housing projects, which are implemented in a single operating system of the development company. The problems of investment activity of stakeholder construction companies, which have been constantly carried out in many countries by prominent foreign and domestic scientists, have been studied. Several variants of circumstances that shape the external and internal environment of the developer are analyzed, which must be taken into account when determining the strengths and weaknesses of the enterprise, its capabilities and threats, which provides a general picture of the internal situation and is important for developing optimal strategy for the enterprise. The operating system is determined by the introduction of fundamentally new updated scientific and applied tools designed to provide the development company with a clear formalization and proper analytical support of the processes of formation, analysis, and productive subsequent administration: the leading innovation of the tools introduced commercial housing construction, which are implemented in a complex economic and managerial format – production-technological, resource-logistical and administrative management of the content of business processes of project cycles as part of the portfolio of housing construction projects of the developer.

Ключевые слова

SPACE analysis, SWOT-analysis of the developer company, portfolio of housing construction projects of the developer company (PPBZh-KD), asset management company (AMC), methodological and applied tools for the formation and administration of PPBZh-KD.

Полный текст:

PDF (English)


Ryzhakova, G. (2013). Alternative analytical tools for ensuring the economic security of public

investment in construction projects. Management of complex systems development. no. 16, 203 - 208.

Tanaka, H. (2006). Increasing the return on investment in construction and project management:

the experience and prospects of Japan. Project and program management, 1 (5), 24-40.

Tesla, Yu. Gots, V., & Gots, H. Sources of formation of the information environment of the development

company. Access mode: ua / zbirnyk-7 / article-240.

Blank, I. (2006). Financial strategy of the enterprise. К.: Elga: Nika centre, 456.

Bushuyeva, N. (2010). Management of development of the enterprises of building branch by formation of

their strategic potential: author’s ref. dis. for science. degree of Cand. tech. science: special. 05.13.22

- project management and production development. Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture. Kyiv, 20 p.

Yegorchenkova, N. (2012). Integration of matrix technologies and method of critical chains and

resource management of portfolios of projects and programs [Text]: coll. Science. etc. Management

of complex systems development, no. 7, 30–35.

Chupryna, K. (2019). Modeling of spatial data on the construction site based on multidimensional

information objects. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, 3934-

Chupryna, Y. (2018). The organization of biosphere compatibility construction: Justification of the

predictors of building development and the implementation prospects. International Journal of

Engineering and Technology (UAE), vol. 7, no. 3, 545-549.

Ushatsky, S. (2008). Innovative conceptual and formal-analytical tools for substantiation, preparation

and implementation of construction investment projects. A monograph. Kyiv, 208.



  • Ссылки не определены.

(P): 2707-9031
(E): 2707-904X

Articles are open access under the Creative Commons License  

Бизнес-центр EXPO, блок C.1.
Казахстан, 010000