S. Stetsenko, L. Sorokina, A. Goiko, T. Tsyfra, N. Bolila


This paper considers the pecularities of the formation of econmic immunity of construction companies. A system has been proposed to improve the mechanisms of preventive protection and securement of enterprises from loss of viability and subsequent self-liquidation or bankruptcy, which allows effectively identifying existing risks and threats from micro-, meso- and macro-environments and responding to them with the preventive means through economic immunity. A new definition for the term «economic immunity» of the enterprise is proposed, which includes subsystems of monitoring, early detection of internal and external threats, assessment of the degree of danger (risks), defusion, elimination or neutralization, and formation of «memory» of the threat through a system of indicators. The differences of economic indicators of construction enterprises, which are characterized by different levels of the anti-crisis potential use, are studied, the five most significant indicators of the use of the anti-crisis potential are identified. The rules-conditions for determining the level of activation of anti-crisis opportunities and vulnerability of enterprises to threats for economic security are formulated. Methods of identification and control of the level of anticrisis potential use of the construction enterprise in the context of digital transformation which allows estimating quality and expediency of administrative actions are developed.

The formation mechanism of the anti-crisis potential of the construction enterprise is developed. Its structure is defined, conceptual foundations of the integrated information system creation of the construction enterprise that should provide the possibility of interaction of various subsystems within the enterprise and the analysis of threats from interaction with various stakeholders are substantiated.

Ключевые слова

economic security, anti-crisis potential, digitalization, financial indicators, construction enterprise, economic immunity, CALS-technologies

Полный текст:

PDF (English)


Zeltser, R.Ya., Bielienkova, O.Yu., Novak, Ye., & Dubinin, D.V. (2019). Digital Transformation of Resource Logistics and Organizational and Structural Support of Construction. Science and Innovation,

(5), 38-51

Tugay, O.A., Zeltser, R.Ya., Kolot, M.A., & Panasiuk, I.O. (2019). Organization of Supervision over

Construction Works Using Uavs and Special Software, Science and Innovation, 15 (4), 23-32

Stetsenko, S.P. (2013). Accounting systems of different levels as a basis for economic security.

Investments: practice and experience, 22. 105-107.

Molodid, O.O. (2012). System approach to economic and mathematical modeling of economic security of

a construction company [Electronic resource]. Efficient economy, 9. Access mode: www/URL: http://

Chan, J.K.W., Tam, C.M., & Cheung, R.K.C. (2005). Construction firms at the crossroads in hong kong:

Going insolvency or seeking opportunity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,

(2), 111-124. doi:10.1108/09699980510584476

Migus, I.P., & Andrienko, V.M. (2014). The structure and basic elements of the system of economic

security in the management of occupational safety at construction enterprises. Business Inform, 10,


Fisunenko, P.A., & Lazhe, M.V. (2015). Features of economic security of construction companies.

Ways to increase the efficiency of construction in the formation of market relations, 33, 156-164.

Fisunenko, P.A., & Shevchenko, K.I. (2019). Criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of the

enterprise in ensuring their economic security. Economic space, (151), 185-200. https://doi.


Cherevko, O.V., & Dmitrenko, V.I. (2015). Features of the system of economic security of construction

companies. Investments: practice and experience, 12. 49–51.

Pushkar, T.A., & Dyachenko, K.S. (2013). Features of economic security of construction companies.

Problems and prospects of entrepreneurship development. 2, 134-139.

Shtangret A.M., Petrashova O.M. (2011). Theoretical approaches to determining the hierarchical

levels of the category; economic security. Formation of market relations in Ukraine, 24-29.

Vitlinsky, V.V. (2004). Riscology in economics and entrepreneurship: a monograph. K .: KNEU, 480 p.

Prikhodko, S.V. (2011). Formation of a set of measures to respond to threats to economic security

adequate to real production and economic processes. Investment practice and experience, 4, 52-55.

Stetsenko, S.P., Tytok, V.V., Emelianova, O.M., Bielienkova, O.Yu. & Tsyfra T.Yu. (2020). Management

of Adaptation of Organizational and Economic Mechanisms of Construction to Increasing Impact

of Digital Technologies on the National Economy. Journal of Reviews on Global Economic, 9, 49-164.

Rutkovskaya, D., Pilins’kij, M., & Rutkovskij, L. (2007). Nejronnye seti, geneticheskie algoritmy i

nechetkie sistemy. M.: Goryachaya liniya – Telekom.

Organizational and technological, economic quality control aspects in the construction industry:

collective monograph. Lviv-Toruń: Liha-Pres.

Stetsenko, S.P., & Bolila, N.V. (2019). Key determinants of formation of anti-crisis potential of

construction enterprises [Electronic resource]. Current economic problems, 7 (217), pp. 23-45.

Stetsenko, S., Bolila, N., Sorokina, L., Tsyfra, T., & Molodid, O. (2020). Monitoring mechanism of

resilience of the anti-crisis potential system of the construction enterprise in the long-term period.

Economics, finance and management review, 3, 31-42.

Bolila, N.V. (2019). Functional-operational transformation of construction enterprise management

systems based on CALS-technologies. Management of complex systems development, 40, 156 -159.

Chorna, N.O. (2011). Estimation of possibility of application of CALS-technologies to the decision

of problems of distributed management. Management of complex systems development, 8, 97-100.


Bielienkova, O., Stetsenko, S., Sorokina, L., Molodid, O., & Bolila N. (2020). System of preventive

аction of construction enterprises on the basis of identification of anticrisis potential. Scientific

Journal of Astana IT University, 3. 15-27.

Stetsenko, S., Marchuk, T., Ryzhakov, D., & Ryzhakova, G. (2017). Identification of the basic elements of the innovation-analitical platform for energy efficiency in project financing. Investment Management and Finansial Innovation, 14, 12 -20.

Ryzhakov, D., Chupryna, Y., & Malykhina, O. (2018). The identification of alternatives and changes

in scenarios for the development of regional build clusters. International Journal of Engineering & Technology – USA, Florida: Science Publishing Corporation, 10(3.2), 484-486.

Honcharenko, T., Chupryna, Y., Ivakhnenko, I., Tsyfra, T., & Zinchenco, M. (2020). Reengineering of

the Construction Companies Based on BIM-technology. International Journal of Emerging Trends in

Engineering Research, 8.



  • Ссылки не определены.

(P): 2707-9031
(E): 2707-904X

Articles are open access under the Creative Commons License  

Бизнес-центр EXPO, блок C.1.
Казахстан, 010000