Integrated anti-risk management of conflicts of a scientific project in a behavioral economics

D. Bedrii

Аннотация


The object of the research is the processes of managing uncertainties such as risks, conflicts, and factors of behavioral economics which may have negative consequences for a scientific project. The study has revealed that the success of any project depends on the ability of the project manager to effectively manage his team to meet the values of each stakeholder and the goals of the project itself. To solve this goal it is necessary to complete the following tasks: • analysis of methods of integration of risk management, conflicts and factors of behavioral economics; • justification of the necessity to build integrated anti-risk management of conflicts in behavioral economics; • to carry out conceptual modeling of integrated anti-risk conflict management in behavioral economics. A conceptual model of integrated anti-risk management of conflicts of a scientific project in the context of behavioral economics is proposed, built based on the “Change Management Iceberg” model. The management of scientific projects has been further developed through the integration of methodologies: project management, the theory of stakeholders, risk management, HR management, conflict management, and behavioral economics. A conceptual scheme of integrated anti-risk management of conflicts of a scientific project in behavioral economics has been developed which allows a project manager to manage uncertainties (risks, conflicts, factors of behavioral economics). Research refers to the project management methodology and improves it by integrating the processes of risk, conflict, and behavioral economics management into one process. The main goal of the study is to reduce and eliminate all negative consequences in a scientific project, to complete it within the approved budget, terms and a certain quality.

Ключевые слова


project management methodology, scientific project, “iceberg” model, integrated anti-risk management, conflict, factors of behavioral economics.

Полный текст:

PDF (English)

Литература


A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (2017). Sixth Edition. USA.

PMI, 574.

Individual competence baseline for Project, Program and Portfolio management (IPMA ICB) (2015).

IPMA. Version 4.0. 431.

Freeman R.E. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press. 300.

Bushuev, S., Bushueva, N., Babaev, I., Yakovenko V., Grisha E., Dzyuba S., & Vojtenko, A. (2010).

Kreativnye tekhnologii upravleniya proektami i programmami. Monografiya. K.: «Sammit-Kniga», 768.

Demarko, T., & Lister, T. (2005). Chelovecheskiy faktor: uspeshnyye proyekty i komandy. SPb, Symbol

Plus, 200.

Sepeda Huaman, D.F. (2018). Model’ otochennya orhanizatsiynoho proektu v umovakh povedinkovoyi ekonomiky. 3th Mizhnarodnoyi naukovo praktychnoyi konferentsiyi «Project, Program, Portfolio

Management». Odessa, ONPU, 89–91.

Bedrii, D. (2017). Osoblyvosti proektno-oriyentovanoho upravlinnya naukovymy proektamy. 2th International Scientific and Practical Conference «Project, Program, Portfolio Management». Odessa,

ONPU, 15-18.

Bushuyev S., Bushuyev D. & Neizvestnyy S.I. (2020, June). Konvergentsiya i gibridizatsiya metodologiy upravleniya proyektami. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, vol. 2, 86-101. DOI:

37943/AITU.2020.22.12.008.

Bushuyeva, N., Kozyr’, B. & Zaprivoda A.A. (2020, June). Mnogourovnevoye gibridnoye upravleniye infrastukturnimi programammi. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, vol. 2, 71-85. DOI:

37943/AITU.2020.20.47.007.

Neizvestnyy, S., Neizvestnyy N. & Sheshukov M. (2019). Primeneniye konvergentnykh tekhnologiy

upravleniya v programmakh proyektov vysokoy neopredelennosti tselepolaganiya. Osobennosti

protsessa tselepolaganiya. Upravleniye proyektami i programmami, vol. 4, no. 60, 290-299.

Piterska, V.M. (2018). Ryzyko-oriyentovane upravlinnya naukovoyu diyal’nistyu zakladiv vyshchoyi osvity v ramkakh innovatsiynykh program. Avtoref. Dys. Odessa, ONMU, 42 p.

Danchenko, O.B. (2015). Metodolohiya intehrovanoho upravlinnya vidkhylennyamy v proektakh.

Avtoref. Dys. Kyiv, KNUBA, 45.

Yakovleva, E.A. (2016). Analiz vozmozhnostey ispol’zovaniya printsipov povedencheskoy ekonomiki

dlya prinyatiya effektivnykh upravlencheskikh resheniy. Sovremennyye tekhnologii upravleniya, vol.

, no. 65, art. 6504. https://sovman.ru/article/6504/.

Taleb, N.N. (2015). Chernyy lebed’. Pod znakom nepredskazuyemosti. Moscow: KoLibri, 736.

Bedrii, D. (2020). Development of a model of integrated risk and conflict management of scientific

project stakeholders under conditions of behavioral economics. Technology audit and production

reserves, vol. 3, no. 2(53), 9-14. DOI: 10.15587/2706-5448.2020.207086.

Danchenko, O.B, Bedrii, D. & Semko, I. (2018). Kontseptual’na model’ formuvannya vysokoefektyvnoyi komandy naukovoho proektu”. Visnyk NTU «KhPI». Kharkov, NTU «KhPI» Publ., no. 1 (1277),

-56. DOI: 10.20998/2413-3000.2018.1277.8.

Zatserkovnyy, V.I., Oberemok, I.I., Oberemok, N.V., & Yehorchenkova, N.Yu. (2016). Intehratsiya protsesiv upravlinnya proektom na etapi planuvannya v biznes-protsesy kompaniyi. Technology audit

and production reserves, no. 6/1(32), 35-42. DOI: 10.15587/2312-8372.2016.86176.

Project Management Institute (2014). Navigating Complexity: A Practice Gide. Newtown Square, PA:

Author.

Danchenko, O., Bedriy, D. & Semko I. (2019). Upravlinnya konfliktamy naukovoho proektu. Visnyk NTU

«KhPI». Kharkov, NTU «KhPI» Publ., no. 2 (1327), 28-35. DOI: 10.20998/2413-3000.2019.1327.5.

Aysberg upravleniya izmeneniyami [Elektronnyy resurs] / Wilfried Kruger. Rezhim dostupa: http://

www.12manage.com/methods_change_management_iceberg_ru.

Ladon’ko, L.S., & Hanzha, I.V. (2015). Sutnist’ ta modeli upravlinnya zminamy na pidpryyemstvi.

Naukovyy visnyk Polissya, №2(2), 101-108.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37943/AITU.2020.15.62.001

Ссылки

  • Ссылки не определены.


(P): 2707-9031
(E): 2707-904X


Нур-Султан
Бизнес-центр EXPO, блок C.1.
Казахстан, 010000

sjaitu@astanait.edu.kz