homescontents
film izle hd film film
avcilar escort beylikduzu escort esenyurt escort
istanbul escort
bornova escort bornova escort
sakarya escort sakarya escort sakarya escort sakarya escort serdivan escort adapazarı escort sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sakarya escort bayan sapanca escort
METHODS OF PROJECT-VECTOR MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS | Biloshchytskyi | Scientific Journal of Astana IT University

METHODS OF PROJECT-VECTOR MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS

А. Biloshchytskyi, S. Omirbayev, A. Mukhatayev

Аннотация


Based on the developed mathematical model of the project-vector space, the methods of determining the endpoints of the objects of the project-vector space (PVS) and the calculation of the trajectory of the movement to these points are proposed. It is shown that the problem of developing these methods is related to the definition of such projects (project integration), which will correspond to the maximum expansion of “Universal Projects” educational environment. Calculation of the trajectory of the movement in the project-vector space ensures the achievement of the objectives of the project with minimal time and financial resources. It is proposed to use the Monte Carlo method to calculate the options for the trajectory of PVS subjects. This distribution of probabilities when choosing the displacement of objects and subjects of PVS corresponds to the priority of subjects and the impact of objects on the displacement of these subjects. For the assessment of the magnitude of the impact on the movement of PVS subjects it was developed the structure of the expert table and the model of the calculation of the average expert assessment of such an impact. Implementation of the given methods will allow to dynamically evaluate the most important goals for all interested parties of the project, as well as to develop ways to achieve them in real terms. In this case, the real conditions of the projects are described in the system of impact on the movement of objects and subjects of PVS in the expanding “Universal Projects”.

Ключевые слова


project-vector space, educational environments, trajectory of movement in project-vector space

Полный текст:

PDF

Литература


Andrukh, A.G. (2006). Decomposition scheme of the management system of a higher educational

institution, taking into account information and control influences. State Scientific-Preceding and

Design Institute for Titanium, 1, 104-107.

Biloshchytskyi, A.A., Biloshchytskya, S.V., Sinitsa, V.Yu., Teslya, N.Yu. (2011). Organizational elements

of a project-managed higher educational institution. Management of the development of folding

systems, 5, 6-9.

Biloshchytskyi, A.A. (2011). Expanding Universe of Projects. Bulletin of ChDTU, 3, 67–71.

Biloshchytskyi, A.A. (2011). The structure of the methodology of design-vector management of

educational environments. Collection of Science Works: Management of the development of folding

systems, 7, 121-125.

Biloshchytskyi, A.A. (2012). Model of the expanding universe of projects in the management of

educational environments. Eastern European Journal of Advanced Technologies, 1/11 (55), 41-43.

Bikov, V.Yu. (2009). Models of Organizational Systems of Intelligence. Monograph. K.: Attack, 684.

Bikov, V.Yu. (2010). Systems for managing projects and programs – modern tools for the innovative

social and economic development of Ukraine, Kharkiv: NTU “KhPI”, 26 (30), 61-71.

Burkov, V.N., Kwon, O.F., Tsitovich, L.A. (1997). Models and methods of multi-project management. M.:

IPU, 62.

Bushuev, S.D., Bushueva, N.S. (2010). Creative technologies for project management and development

programs. Monography. K.: Summit Kniga, 768.

Biloshchytskyi A.O. (2009). Theoretical foundations of vector information technologies and

their storage to induce systems for planning communications with primary robots at VNZ III-IV

accreditation. Eastern European Journal of Advanced Technologies. 3/2 (39), 35-41.

Clifforth F.G., Larson, E.W. (2003). Gray Project Management. M.: Business and service, 528.

Strongin, R.G., Grudzinsky, A.O. (2008). Project-oriented management of an innovative university.

Higher education in Russia, 4, 26-31

Tanaka, H. (2006). Increasing the return on investment in construction and project management:

experience and prospects of Japan. Project and Program Management, 1 (05), 24-40.

Turner, R. (2007). Guide to project-based management. Publishing House, 550.

The Standard for Portfolio management. (2008). Project Management Institute, Inc. Four Campus

Boulevard Newtown Square, Pennsylvania USA, 203.

Laszlo, C.A., Levine, M.D., Milsum, J. H. (1974). Total Quality Management TQM. A General Systems

Framework for Social Systems, Behavioral Science, Total quality management, 19(2), 79-92.

Biloshchytskyi, A. (2011). Design and vector management of higher educational institutions.

Collection of Science Practices: Management of the development of folding systems, 6, 135-139

Saati T. (1991). Analytical planning. Organization of systems. M.: Radio and communication, 244.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37943/AITU.2021.38.59.002

Ссылки

  • Ссылки не определены.


(P): 2707-9031
(E): 2707-904X

Articles are open access under the Creative Commons License  


Нур-Султан
Бизнес-центр EXPO, блок C.1.
Казахстан, 010000

sjaitu@astanait.edu.kz