homescontents
deneme bonusu veren siteler deneme bonusu veren siteler deneme bonusu veren siteler deneme bonusu veren siteler deneme bonusu veren siteler
film izle
ISSUES OF ICT INTEGRATION IN RURAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF KAZAKHSTAN | Kurmangaliyev | Scientific Journal of Astana IT University

ISSUES OF ICT INTEGRATION IN RURAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF KAZAKHSTAN

A. Kurmangaliyev

Аннотация


The problem with attaining education equality for various categories of the population has been one of the priority topics of social and political studies. Kazakhstan has recently stated the aim to ensure equal access for all participants in the educational process to the best resources and technologies. However, half of all state schools are in rural areas and supporting them is often inadequate in comparison to urban schools. These schools have minimal infrastructure, for example, a lack of proper Internet access and professional development opportunities for teachers. The barriers to information and communication technologies in education seem to be one of the main issues for teaching staff in rural settings. The purpose of this research was to explore the issues of ICT integration in teaching and learning processes among secondary school teachers. This multiple case study explored the experiences of eight instructors from three rural schools through semi-structured interviews, lesson observations, and curriculum analysis. The results reveal evidence of the very poor quality of the Internet in visited rural schools. The findings also demonstrate that teachers often have to use their personal mobile phones at work despite the ban from administration. This, along with the poor technological capability of the schools, negatively affects the educational process in visited schools.

Ключевые слова


ICT in education, rural schools, digital gap, qualitative research, multiple case study, Kazakhstan

Полный текст:

PDF (English)

Литература


Abankina, T., Krasilova, A., & Yastrebov, G. (2012). Education as a Start in Life: Life Plans of Rural High School Students in Russia. Educational Studies, (2), 87-120.

Pons, A., Amoroso, J., Herczynski, J., Kheyfets, I., Lockheed, M., & Santiago, P. (2015). OECD Reviews of School Resources.

Cohen, L., Manion, L.& Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education 6th edition. USA: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 250-255.

Concept of development of ungraded schools in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2010-2020 (2011).

Astana, Ministry of Education and Science of Kazakhstan, 2-17.

Febriana, M., Nurkamto, J., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Muhtia, A. (2018). Teaching in rural Indonesian schools: Teachers’ challenges. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding,

(5), 11-20.

Gerring, J. (2004). What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? The American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341-354.

Gewirtz, S. (2006). Towards a contextualized analysis of social justice in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(1), 69-81.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.

Helmer, J., Harper, H., & Wolgemuth, J. (2018). Teachers’ Values and Expectations of Technology in

Northern Territory Primary Schools. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 10,

-162.

Hopkins, D. (2013). Exploding the myths of school reform. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 304-321.

Kerimbayev, N., Akramova, A., & Suleimenova, J. (2016). E-learning for ungraded schools of Kazakhstan: Experience, implementation, and innovation. Education and Information Technologies, 21(2), 443-451.

Kim, H. J., & Kim, H. (2017). Investigating teachers’ pedagogical experiences with tablet integration in Korean rural schools. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1-2), 107-116.

Kudasheva, T., Kunitsa, S., & Mukhamediyev, B. (2015). Effects of access to education and information-communication technology on income inequality in Kazakhstan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 191, 940-947.

Pisa, O. (2010). Pisa 2009 results: Executive Summary. Accessible on webpage: http://www. oecd. org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703. pdf Retrieved, 12(09), 2014.

OECD (2014). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264205208-en.

OECD (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en

Pelgrum, W.J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide

educational assessment, Computers & Education, 37(2), ISSN 0360-1315, https://doi.org/10.1016/

S0360-1315(01)00045-8, pp. 163-178.

Rules for conducting a unified national testing (2011). Ministry of Science and Education in

Kazakhstan, 5 December 2011, №506 https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1100007367

Sangrà, A., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2010). The role of information and communication technologies in improving teaching and learning processes in primary and secondary schools.

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(8), 207-220

Sapargaliyev, D., & Shulenbayeva, K. (2013). Informatization of Kazakhstani higher education.

Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 468-472.

Selwyn, N. (2004). The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and

communications technology. Journal of Aging studies, 18(4), 369-384.

State Program of Education Development (SPED) in Kazakhstan for 2011-2020 (2010). Astana,

Republic of Kazakhstan, December 7, 1118. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U1000001118

UNESCO (2012). The Global Monitoring Report on Education for All. Paris, UNESCO Publ., p.44

Yamaletdinova, A.M., & Medvedeva, A.S. (2016). Modern information and communication technologies in the educational process. Bulletin of the Bashkir University, 21(4), 1134-1141.

Bai, Y., Mo, D., Zhang, L., Boswell, M., & Rozelle, S. (2016). The impact of integrating ICT with teaching: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in rural schools in China. Computers &

Education, 96, 1-14.

Zabara, L., Boranbayeva, S. (2015). Analysis of Unified National Testing 2015, Astana, Kazakhstan: АО IAC, 6-55.

Zhang, H. (2017). Opportunity or new poverty trap: Rural-urban education disparity and internal migration in China. China Economic Review, 44, 112-124.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37943/AITU.2021.45.41.008

Ссылки

  • Ссылки не определены.


(P): 2707-9031
(E): 2707-904X

Articles are open access under the Creative Commons License  


Нур-Султан
Бизнес-центр EXPO, блок C.1.
Казахстан, 010000

sjaitu@astanait.edu.kz
https://ejournal.unperba.ac.id/pages/uploads/sv388/ https://ejournal.unperba.ac.id/pages/uploads/ladangtoto/ https://poltekkespangkalpinang.ac.id/public/assets/scatter-hitam/ https://poltekkespangkalpinang.ac.id/public/assets/blog/sv388/ https://poltekkespangkalpinang.ac.id/public/uploads/depo-5k/ https://smpn9prob.sch.id/content/luckybet89/