THE KÜBLER-ROSS FACTOR IN MANAGING THE PERFORMANCE OF TECHNICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

D. Lukianov, K. Kolesnikova, O. Mezentseva, V. Rudenko

Аннотация


The article proposes to consider the possibility of using the Kübler-Ross model as a mandatory and necessary addition when restoring systems after critical failures, accidents, and other catastrophic events. As stages of the model, it is proposed to consider the “extension” of the classical Kübler-Ross model in the form of an Extended Grief Cycle. Moreover, each “stage of the model” is considered as a separate “state” of the system. It is also assumed that the transition from any state of the model is possible not only “linearly forward”, but also in any other direction. Moreover, the probabilities of such transitions do not depend on the previous history of the system. Such an assumption allows us to consider the possibility of interpreting the created model as a Markov model, and, accordingly, to apply the mathematical apparatus of Markov chains for its study. It is proposed to consider such a characteristic of an effective recovery system as the “readiness” of a recovery team to transition to a productive state as soon as possible from the point of view of group dynamics and the effectiveness of the distribution of team roles. For this, it is proposed to use the logic of the team role model of R. Belbin. Minimizing the time to achieve the effect of maximum effectiveness in emergency situations in the context of the concept of incident preparedness and continuity of work, in this case, will depend not only on technical and other means of response but also on the psychological stability of the recovery team members, the effective allocation of roles and readiness for adequate action. This is confirmed by the results of transient modeling. The simulation results show the dominant value of the probabilities of being in the states of “shock” and “inoperative system” if you do not control the system purposefully and do not go through all stages of the Extended Grief Cycle model sequentially, one after another.

Ключевые слова


The Extended Grief Cycle, Kübler-Ross model, Model R. Belbin roles, Markov model of communications, performance recovery, business continuity, reliability, hazardous event, Business Continuity Management Lifecycle Stages, preparedness for hazardous sit

Полный текст:

PDF (English)

Литература


BS 25999-1:2006, Business continuity management - PART 1: CODE OF PRACTICE https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-us/Standards/BS-25999-1-2006-2006-225498_SAIG_BSI_BSI_529292/

BS25999 B. S. 1: 2006: Business Continuity Management-Part 1: Code of practice //British Standard Institute (BSI) Std. – 2006.

BS 25999-2:2007, Business continuity management – PART 2: SPECIFICATION https://infostore.

saiglobal.com/en-gb/Standards/BS-25999-2-2007-2007-280781_SAIG_BSI_BSI_648384/ BSI B.

S. 25999-2: 2007 Business continuity management //Specification. BSI. – 2007.

ISO 22301:2012 Societal security – Business continuity management systems – Requirements

https://www.iso.org/standard/50038.html ISO B. S. 22301: 2012. Societal security. Business continuity management systems. Requirements //British Standards Institute, London. – 2012. – С. 15-19.

ISO 22313:2012 Societal security – Business continuity management systems – Guidance, https://

www.iso.org/standard/50050.html DIS I. S. O. 22313: 2012: Societal security–Business continuity

management systems – Guidance //International Organization for Standardization. 2012.

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 Information technology - Security techniques - Guidelines for information and communication technology readiness for business continuity https://www.iso.org/standard/44374.

html Techniques I. T. S. Iso/iec 27037: 2012 information technology security techniques guidelines

for identification collection acquisition and preservation of digital evidence //ISO/IEC-The standard

was published in October. – 2012.

Societal security – Guideline for incident preparedness and operational continuity management.

(2008). https://www.iso.org/standard/50295.html Tangen S. ISO/PAS 22399 provides international best practice for preparedness and conti-nuity management //ISO Management Systems, 5.

Societal security – Guideline for incident preparedness and operational continuity management

ISO/PAS 22399:2007 https://www.sis.se/api/document/preview/909330/

Business Continuity Concepts a Glance. (2014). https://ismetyaksi.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/

business-continuity-concepts-at-a-glance/. Access date: 10.11.2019.

Trenton Baker What is RTO / RPO Redefined: The Race to Zero. ()https://www.keepitsafe.com/blog/

post/the-difference-between-rto-and-rpo/.

Mathias Engstrand Data availability and protection. https://www.eiseverywhere.com/file_uploads/

b438e21c6d030eb97312aa52c3884c2_DataAvailabilityandProtection.pdf .

Information technology – Security techniques – Guidelines for information and communications

technology disaster recovery services. (2008). https://www.iso.org/standard/41532.html. ISO/IEC

TR 24762:2008

Robert Whitcher. A framework for resilience and success BS 25999-1:2006 Business continuity management. Part 1: Code of practice (2006). http://www.efectus.cl/upload_files/documentos/27102009085025-141381139.pdf

MENEDZhMENT NEPRERYVNOSTI BIZNESA Upravleniye chelovecheskimi resursami. (2013). GOST

R 53647.8.

Pyat stadiy modeli Kyubler-Ross. https://orgdev.ru/pyat-stadiy-modeli-kyubler-ross-a23512a83e4a.

Access date:10.11.2019.

The Kubler-Ross Grief Cycle. http://changingminds.org/disciplines/change_management/kubler_

ross/kubler_ross.html Access date:10.11.2019.

Belbin, R.M. (2012). Team roles at work. Routledge.

Kolesnіkov, O. (2016). et al. Development of the model of interaction among the project. team

of project and project environment in project system. Vostochno-Evropeyskiy zhurnal peredovykh

tekhnologiy. 5 (9). 20-26.

Lukianov, D. (2017). Development of the markov model of a project as a system of role communications in a team. Vostochno-Evropeyskiy zhurnal peredovykh tekhnologiy, 3 (3), 21-28.

Lukianov, D.V., Gogunskiy, V.D., & Kolesnikova, E.V. (2018). Transformatsiya komandnykh roley v upravlencheskikh komandakh. D.V. Lukianov. V.D. Gogunskiy. E.V. Kolesnikova / Materialy konferentsii

VІ Ukraїnsko-nіmetska konferentsіya «Іnformatika. Kultura. Tekhnіka», 1(1), 68-69.

Lukianov, D., Mazhei, K., & Gogunskii, V. (2019). Transformation of the International Project Management Association Project Managers Individual Competencies Model. 2019 IEEE International

Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (ATIT). Kyiv. Ukraine, 506-512. http://doi:

1109/ATIT49449.2019.9030486.

Delo, M., & Lopatnikov, L.I. (2003). Ekonomiko-matematicheskiy slovar: Slovar sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy nauki.

Piterska, V. (2018). Development of the Markovian model for the life cycle of a project’s benefits //

Vostochno-Evropeyskiy zhurnal peredovykh tekhnologiy, 5(4), 30-39.

Talebm, N. (2018). Kak vladet lyudmi v sovremennom mire. https://econet.ru/articles/163410-nassim-taleb-kak-vladet-lyudmi-v-sovremennom-mire – Access date: 09.01.2020.


Ссылки

  • Ссылки не определены.


(P): 2707-9031
(E): 2707-904X


Нур-Султан
Бизнес-центр EXPO, блок C.1.
Казахстан, 010000

sjaitu@astanait.edu.kz